Allah
In name of the
most Affectionate the Merciful.
O beloved! Say you, O' People! If you love Allah, then follow me; Allah will love you and forgive your sins and Allah is forgiving, Merciful. (Al-Imran)
Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, yes he is messenger of Allah and the last one among all the Prophets, And Allah knows all things. (Al-Ahzab)
O' Believers! Riase not your voices above the Communicator of unseen (the prophe) and speak not aloud in presence of him as you should to one another, lest your works become vain while you are unwere. (Al-Huzuraat)
And Obey Allah and Obey the Messenger. (Al-Taghabun)
Attaintion...........
Lo! Those who malign Allah and His messenger, Allah has cursed them in the world and Hereafter, And has prepared for them the doom of the disdained. (Al-Ahzaab)
Nobody amongst you will become a Muslim unless I am dearer to him than his Parents, Children and all other persons. (Bukhari & Muslim)
Lo! Those who malign Allah and His messenger, Allah has cursed them in the world and Hereafter, And has prepared for them the doom of the disdained. (Al-Ahzaab)
Nobody amongst you will become a Muslim unless I am dearer to him than his Parents, Children and all other persons. (Bukhari & Muslim)
Undoubtely, Allah and His angles send blessings
on the Prophet the Communicator of unseen news, O you who believe! Send
upon him blessings and Salute him fully well in abudence.
O' Allah! Give reward to our Hazrat Muhammad the reward which is benefitting as he deserves. (Al-Ahzab)
O' Allah! Give reward to our Hazrat Muhammad the reward which is benefitting as he deserves. (Al-Ahzab)
Devbandi Vs Devbandi
BELIEF OF HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB:
Haji Imdadullah Sahib
is the spiritual guide of Deobandi scholars; he commemorates his spiritual
guide Hazrat Khwaja Noor Muhammad (ALLAH’s mercy be upon him) as:
تم ہو اے نور محمد خاص محبوب خدا
ہند میں ہو نائب حضرت محمد مصطفیٰ
ہند میں ہو نائب حضرت محمد مصطفیٰ
تم مدد گار مدد ، امداد کو پھر خوف کیا
عشق کی پر سن کے باتیں کانپتے ہیں دست و پا
اے شہ نور محمد ، وقت ہے امداد کا
آسرا دنیا میں ہے از بس تمہاری ذات کا
(امداد المشتاق، صفحہ ١١٦ از مولوی اشرف علی تھانوی و مولوی مشاق احمد دیوبندی، شائم امدایہ صفحہ ٨٤)
Translation:
“You are, O Noor
Muhammad, the remarkably beloved of ALLAH; you are the deputy of Hazrat
Muhammad Mustafa (SalALLAHu Alaihi Wasallam) in India.
You are the helper then
what to worry for assistance; but hands and feet shiver when hear
communications of love (‘Ishq).
O master Noor Muhammad!
This is the time for assistance; the only reliance in the world is your
personality.”
(Imdad ul Mushtaq, page
116, by Ashraf Ali Thanvi and Mushtaq Ahmed Deobandi; Shumaim-e-Imdadiya, page
84)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
تجھ سو ا مانگے جو غیروں سے مدد
فی الحقیقت ہے وہی مشرک اشد
فی الحقیقت ہے وہی مشرک اشد
دوسرا اس سا نہیں دنیا میں بد
ہے گلے میں اس کے حبل من مسد
سب سے اس پر لعنت و پھٹکار ہے
مردوں سے حاجتیں مانگنا اور ان کی منتیں مننا کفار کی راہ ہے
(تذکیرالاخوان،ص٣٤٣ و ص٨٣، از مولوی اسماعیل دہلوی)
Translation:
“One who asks help from
others; in reality he is extreme Mushrik (polytheist).
There is no other evil
like him in the world; there is ‘a rope of palm fiber’ in its neck.
Curse and damnation be
on him from all; to plead dead and beg for necessities is the way of pagans.”
(Tazkeerul Ikhwaan, page
343 and page 83, by Ismail Dehlvi)
QASIM NANOTAVI VS ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF QASIM NANOTAWI, FOUNDER OF MADARASA-E-DEOBAND:
مدد کر اے کرم
احمدی کہ تیرے سوا
نہیں ہے قاسم بے کس کا کوئی حامی کار
نہیں ہے قاسم بے کس کا کوئی حامی کار
مگر کرے روح القد س میری مددگاری
تو اس کی مدح میں کروں میں رقم اشعار
جو جبرئیل مدد پر ہو فکر کی میرے
تو آگے بڑھ کے کہوں کہ جہان کے سردار
(قصائد قاسمی، ص٧ تا ٨)
Translation:
“Help me O blessings of
Ahmed; that there is no supporter of powerless Qasim other than you.
But Roohul Qudus does
for me the assistance; so in his praise I write couplets.
When Jibra’eel is for
help on my dangers; so I, going further, say the lord of universe.”
(Qasaaid-e-Qasmi, page
7-8)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“When in trouble, often
people supplicate to spiritual guides, Messengers, martyrs and fairies. They
are indulged in Shirk (polytheism).”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page 5,
by Moulvi Ismail Dehlvi)
ISMAIL DEHLVI VS KHALEEL AMBETHWI
BELIEF OF MOULVI ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“All the humans are
brothers among each other, the one who is higher-ranking respect him as elder
brother…… Prophets, saints, Imams, spiritual guides and all the creations of
ALLAH are surely human and are incapable servants (Bande ‘Aajiz) and our
brothers.”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page
28)
FATWA OF KHALEEL AMBETHWI:
“Even a person with
feeble faith cannot verbalize such contemptuous thing from his tongue that the
Holy Prophet (SalALLAHu alaihi wa’Alayhi wassalam) is as superior to us as an
elder brother, if one does that; according to us he is way out from sphere of
faith.”
(Almuhannad, page 28)
Note: This book has attestation of Mehmood
ul Hasan Deobandi, Kifayat Ullah and Moulvi Ashraf Ali Thanvi.
ASHRAF ALI THANVI & HUSSAIN AHMED TANDVI CONGERESSY VS GHULAM KHAN
BELIEF OF ASHRAF ALI THANVI AND
HUSSAIN AHMED CONGRESSY:
کھول دے دل میں در علم حقیقت میرے رب
ہادیٔ عالم علی مشکل کشا کے واسطے
(تعلیم الدین،ص ۱۳۴ از اشرف علی تھانوی؛ سلاسل طیبہ،ص ۱۲۲ از حسین
احمد کانگرسی)
Translation:
“Open the door of
knowledge of reality, O my LORD!
For the sake of the
leader of the universe, Ali the solver of difficulty (Mushkil Kusha)”
(Ta’leemud Deen, page 134,
by Ashraf Ali Thanvi; Salaasil-e-Taiyiba, page 22, by Hussain Ahmed Congressy)
FATWA OF MOULVI GHULAM KHAN:
“How can one be
benevolent, Mushkil-Kusha (solver of difficulty) and openhanded for
someone? People having such beliefs are purely faithless. They have no (legal)
nuptial. The one who does not believe them (possessers of such beliefs) to be
disbeliever or polytheist is himself unfaithful as such.”
(Jawaahirul Qur’aan, page
147, by Moulvi Ghulam Khan)
ASHRAF ALI THANVI VS KHALEEL AMBETHWI
BELIEF OF ASHRAF ALI THANVI:
“What is the specialty
of the Prophet (SalALLAHu alaihi walayhi wassalam) in certain aspects of knowledge
of unseen? Even Zaid, Umar (every Tom, Dick and Harry), rather every insane and
children, also all animals and wild creatures are having such knowledge of
unseen.”
(Hifz-ul-Imaan, page 18,
by Ahsraf Ali Thanvi)
FATWA OF KHALEEL AMBETHVI:
“The person who
equalizes Prophet’s knowledge to Zaid o Bakr, insane, children or animals is
purely an infidel.”
(Almuhannad, page 36, by
Khaleel Ambethvi)
QASIM NANOTAWI VS KHALEEL AMBETHWI
BELIEF OF QASIM NANOTAWI:
“If Prophets are
distinguished from their followers then such distinction is confined only with
regard to knowledge. But so far as deeds are concerned, most often their
followers are equal to them, and some times even excel them”
(Tahzeerun Naas, page 5, by
Founder of Madarasa Deoband Qasim Nanotawi)
FATWA OF KHALEEL AMBETHWI:
“It is our belief that
the person who believes some man to be superior to the Prophet (SalALLAHu
alaihi walayhi wassalam) is absolute infidel. Our scholars have given verdict
of infidelity on him.”
(Almuhannad, page 31)
RASHEED GANGOHI VS ASHRAF ALI THANVI
RASHEED GANGOHI:
His paternal lineage:
“Rashid Ahmed Gangohi
s/o Maulana Hidayat Ahmed s/o Qazi Pir-Bakhsh s/o Qazi Ghulam Hasan s/o Qazi
Ghulam Ali”
His maternal Lineage:
“Rasheed Ahmed s/o
Kareem un Nisa d/o Fareed-Bakhsh s/o Ghulam Qadir s/o Muhammad Saalih s/o
Ghulam Muhammad”
(Tazkiratur Rasheed, part
1, page 13)
Note: This
contains Fareed-Bakhsh (bestowing of Fareed)
and Pir-Bakhsh (bestowing of the spiritual guide) names.
FATWA OF ASHRAF ALI THANVI:
In his self-forged Bahishti Zewar (Page 45,
vol 1) while talking about
infidelity and polytheism, says:
“Adopting names such
as Abdun Nabi, Ali-Baksh, Hussain-Bakhsh (which also
includes Pir-Bakhshand Fareed-Bakhsh), and saying ‘if ALLAH and
Prophet wills this will be done’ are all examples of polytheism.”
As according to Thanvi
paternal and maternal grandfathers of Rasheed Gangohi were polytheists.
AHMED ALI LAHORI & ATAULLAH BUKHARI VS GHULAM KHAN
BELIEF OF AHMED ALI &
AYATULLAH:
“Condition of Shah Jee
(Ayatullah Bukhari) was this that he used to make Hazrat (Ahmed Ali Lahori)
laugh and soothed him with different things for hours. Often he used to kiss
his hands as great respect and used to kiss his beard.”
(Khuddaam-e-Deen, page 18,
September 1962)
FATWA OF GHULAM KHAN:
“If one kisses hands of
his spiritual guide and sits on knees in front of him…then these acts will be
the acts of worship and will be causal of ALLAH’s curse!”
(Jawaahirul Qur’aan, page
61)
“And one who doesn't
say them infidel is himself an infidel.”
(Jawaahirul Qur’aan, page
77)
FOUNDER OF MADARSA DEOBAND
VS
DEOBNADI MUFTI
BELIEF OF FOUNDER OF MADARSA
DEOBAND QASIM NANOTAWI:
“Scam is of different
types and all types are not the same. It’s not necessary for the Prophet to be
guiltless in all the cases. Predominantly to think fib against the dignity of
Prophets with this meaning that it is disobedience and to think the Prophets
are guiltless of sins is untrue.”
(Tasfiyat ul ‘Aqaaid, page
25, 28, by Moulvi Qasim Nanotawi)
FATWA OF DEOBANDI MUFTI:
“Prophets are free from
guiltiness; if someone considers them guilt is not the belief of Ahle Sunnat.
To read his statement is precarious. Common Muslims are not allowed to read
that stuff. Verily ALLAH Almighty knows the best. Ahmed Saeed, Naaib Mufti, Dar
ul Uloom Deoband.
Correct Answer; one
having such belief is infidel, shouldn’t talk to him until he reverts to faith
and refreshes his Nikah (nuptial). (Masood Ahmed, stamp of Dar ul Ifta Deoband
Al-Hind)”
(Ishtihar Muhammad Esa
Naqshbandi, Manager Maktaba Jamat-e-Islami Lodharan district Multan, Monthly
Tajalli-e-Deoband, April 1956)
QASIM NANOTAWI VS SHAFI DEOBANDI
BELIEF OF QASIM NANOTAWI:
“In opinion of ordinary
people, they understand that the era of Prophethood of RasoolULLAH (salALLAHu
alaihi walayhi wassalam) was after all previous Prophets and he is the last
Prophet. But it would be apparent to those who understand that preceding to or
coming after someone has nothing to do with dignity as per personality and then
at level of praise how come ‘yes He is the Messenger of ALLAH and the last one
among all the prophets (Qur’aan)’ be true in this case?”
(Tahzeerun Naas, page 3)
“Even if a Prophet were
to be born after the holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu AlaihiWasallam), the finality
of the holy Prophet (salALLAHu alaihi walayhi wassalam) will not be affected in
any way”.
(Tahzeerun Naas, page 32)
FATWA OF MUFTI SHAFI DEOBANDI:
“Arabic dictionary is
comprehensive over the fact that “Khaataman Nabiyeen” in verse of Qur’aan only
means “The Last Prophet”, nothing else! Ummah have agreed on meaning of
“Khaatim” to be “Last”, one asserting against it is infidel and if he
emphasizes; should be killed.”
(Hidayat ul Mahdeen, page
21, 35)
KHALEEL AMBETHWI VS KHALEEL AMBETHWI
BELIEF OF KHALEEL AMBETHWI AND RASHEED GANGOHI:
“Vast Knowledge for
Angel of death and Satan is assured with Nass, but where it is inevitably
proved from Nass (Qur’aan and Sunnah) for the pride of worlds (the
Holy Prophet, salALLAHu alaihi walayhi wassalam) through which
all Nusoos are rejected and only polytheism is proven.”
(Baraheen-e-Qaati’ah, page
51)
FATWA AGAINST HIS OWN BELIEF:
“Knowledge of the Holy
Prophet (salALLAHu alaihi walayhi wassalam) regarding verdict and secrecy is
greater than knowledge of all the creations for sure. And it’s our belief that
if one says ‘someone is greater than prophet’ he is infidel, and our scholars
have declared him to be infidel who says ‘Devil’s knowledge is more than Prophet
(Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him)’. Then how could this hitch be
present in our writings?”
(Almuhannad, page 31, by
Moulvi Khaleel Ambethvi)
HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB VS RASHEED GANGOHI
BELIEF OF HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB:
اے رسول کبریا فریاد
ہے
یا محمد
مصطفیٰ (ﷺ)
فریاد ہے
سخت مشکل میں پھنسا ہوں آجکل
اے میرے مشکل کشا فریاد ہے
قید غم
سے اب چھڑا
دیجے مجھے
یا شہ ہر دوسرا فریاد
ہے
(نالہ
امداد غریب مناجات، ص ۱۸، از حاجی امداد اللہ صاحب)
Translation:
“O the Grandeur Messenger!
This is appeal; O Muhammad Mustafa (salALLAHu alaihi walayhi wassalam)! This is
appeal.
I’m stuck in severe
hardship nowadays; O my solver of difficulty (Mushkil-Kusha)! This is appeal.
Free me from the
caption of grief; O great king! This is appeal.”
(Nala-e-Imdad Ghareeb
Munaajaat, page 18, by Haji Imdadullah Sahib)
FATWA OF RASHEED GANGOHI:
“When Prophets don’t
have knowledge of unseen then saying ‘O Prophet (Ya Rasool ALLAH)’ would be
invalid too. If one says while keeping this faith that he listens from far away
via knowledge of unseen then this (belief) itself is infidelity.”
(Fatawa-e-Rasheediya, part
3, page 90, by Rasheed Gangohi)
HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB VS ASHRAF ALI THANVI
BELIEF OF HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB:
“‘IbaadiLLAH’ (slaves
of ALLAH) can be called ‘Ibaadir Rasool’ (slaves of the Messenger).”
(Shumaim-e-Imdadiyah, page
135)
FATWA OF ASHRAF ALI THANVI:
“To adopt names
like Ali-Bakhsh, Hussain-Bakhsh, Abdun Nabi is included in
the list of polytheism.”
(Bahishti Zewar, vol 1,
page 45)
QASIM NANOTAWI VS GHULAM KHAN:
BELIEF OF QASIM NANOTAWI:
“The Messenger of ALLAH
(salALLAHu Alaihi Wasallam) has such proximity with his followers which they
(followers) don’t have with their own lives.”
(Tahzeerun Naas, page 12)
FATWA OF GHULAM KHAN:
“One perceiving Prophet
to be present and witnessing is infidel without any doubt.”
(Jawaahirul Qur’aan, page
6)
“One not calling him
infidel is himself an infidel.”
(Jawaahirul Qur’aan, page
77)
MR. MOUDOODI VS ATTAULLAH & AHMED ALI LAHORI
BELIEFS OF MR. MOUDOODI (FOUNDER OF
JAMAT-E-ISLAMI):
“Hazrat Uthman, who was
encumbered with the credence of this virtue, was not skilled with those
specialties which were bestowed to those preceding him, and thus illiteracy got
the way to enter in Islamic communal system.”
(Tajdeed-o-Ahyaa-e-Deen,
page 33)
“It is so fragile that
once such a pious, desireless and sanctimonious human like Hazrat Abu Bakar
failed to accomplish it.”
(Tarjumaan ul Qur’aan,
page 57)
“The reason for
overwhelming success of Prophet (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) in
Arab was that he got the best human foundation. If he would have got junk of
fragile, unreliable and undetermined people with weak strength of mind, could
such results be achieved even then?”
(Tehreek-e-Islami ki Akhlaaqi
Bunyadain, page 17)
“Qur’aan Kareem is not
for the salvation, but it’s for the guidance.”
(Tafheemaat, vol 1, page
312)
“Being a Messenger,
Hazrat Muhammad (salALLAHu alaihi walayhi wassalam) was not set free to act as
per his own desires and wishes, in fulfilling the obligations laid and the
responsibilities given to him.”
(Tarjumaan ul Qur’aan,
Masnsab-e-Risalat number, Page 310)
“Imam Mahdi will be the
leader of most modern style.”
(Tajdeed-o-Ahyaa-e-Deen,
page 55)
“Imam Ghazali
(RahmatULLAH alaih) was weak in knowledge of Hadith. His brain was taken
over by his wits and was engrossed in mystical world more than he needed to.”
(Tajdeed-o-Ahyaa-e-Deen,
page 78)
“Till now no
absolute Mujaddid (revivalist) has born.”
(Tajdeed-o-Ahyaa-e-Deen
page 51)
“Prophet was agitated
that maybe Dajjaal (Anti-Christ) will appear in his era or the era
near to his after him. But now after almost thirteen hundred years have passed,
isn’t it proved that the fear was invalid.”
(Tarjumaanul Qur’aan,
Feburary 1946)
FATWA OF AHMED ALI LAHORI &
ATAULLAH BUKHARI:
“According to my
perception Mr. Moudoodi is one of those 30 Dajjaals.”
(Pamphlet: Haq-Parast
Ulema Ki Moudoodiat Se Narazgi Kay Asbaab, page 97)
“Including such person
(Moudoodi) in the list of Muslims is insult to Islam.”
(Haq-Parast Ulema kay
Modoodiat se Narazgi kay Asbaab, page 115)
“Moudoodi is the
initiator, heretic and fraud.”
(Haq-Parast Ulema kay
Modoodiat se Narazgi kay Asbaab, page 113)
Note: This pamphlet has attestation of over
40 Deobandi scholars.
HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB VS KHALEEL AMBETHWI & RASHEED GANGOHI
BELIEF HAJI IMDADULLAH:
“Our scholars
contradict on Mawlood Sharif; however Intellectuals have also gone towards its
approval. When the condition of its approval is present, even then they show
such extremism that only the obedience of Haramain is for them….. It
would not cause harm if it is assumed the presence (of the Prophet, Peace and
blessings of ALLAH be upon him) among us.”
(Imdad ul Mushtaq, page
55, compiled by Ashraf Ali Thanvi and Mushtaq Ahmed Deobandi)
FATWA OF RASHEED GANGOHI AND
KHALEEL AMBETHWI:
“Every day this commemoration
of birth (of Prophet) is similar to Hindus who celebrate birth of Saang
Kanhaiya each year.” (Baraheen-e-Qaati’ah, Page
148) “Instead, people
(celebrating Mawlood) are worse than that (pagan) nation.”
(Baraheen-e-Qaati’ah, page
149)
SHABEER AHMED USMANI VS ATAULLAH BUKHARI
CONDITION OF MOULVI SHABEER AHMED USMANI:
His fault was that he
joined ‘Muslim League’ and voted for the foundation of Pakistan in last stages.
FATWA OF ATAULLAH BUKHARI:
“People who vote
‘Muslim League’ for Pakistan are pigs and pig-eaters!”
(Chamanistan, page 165,
compiled by Moulvi Zafar Ali)
SHABEER USMANI SAYS:
“Students of Dar ul
Uloom Deoband have sworn us badly, set different shameless cartoons and posters
about us, and even we were called “Abu Jahal” (father of illiterates).”
(Mukaalimatus Sidreen,
page 33)
SHABEER USMANI
VS
HUSSAIN AHMED TANDVI OF CONGRESS
QUAID-E-A’ZAM FOUNDER OF PAKISTAN
MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH:
His fault was that he
worked hard for achievement of a magnificent Islamic country for the innocent
people of Indo-Pak! This struggle made ‘Shaykh ul Islam’ of Congress Hussain
Ahmed Tandvi Annoyed.
Hussain Ahmed Tandvi
labeled joining ‘Muslim League’ as forbidden, and gave “Quaid-e-A’zam” the
title of “Kaafir-e-A’zam” (the greatest infidel).
(Majmoo’a-e-Khutba, page
48)
When Moulvi Shabeer
Usmani Deobandi said it is the reckless disgrace and foolishness to call
“Quaid-e-A’zam” as “Kaafir-e-A’zam”.
(Majmoo’a-e-Khutba, page
32)
Then he (Hussain Ahmed)
suddenly demolished the label of ‘Shaykh ul Islam’ of the helpless Shabeer
Usmani and granted him the splendid label of “Abu Jahal” (father of
illiterate).
(Mukaalimatus Sidreen,
page 33)
FORMER PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN AYUB KHAN VS ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF AYUB KHAN:
“11th September 1960 is
the death anniversary of Quaid-e-A’zam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. And President of
Pakistan (Ayub Khan) is offering Fatiha on the shrine of Founder of
Pakistan and putting cover/mantle on his shrine.”
(Photo on Newspaper
Anjaam, 13 Sept 1960, page 1)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“People covering the
graves with cloth/mantle (and putting flowers), writing dates and making
mausoleum (tomb) on them are not Muslims.”
(Tazkeerul Ikhwaan, page
86)
QASIM NANOTAWI VS ASHRAF ALI THANVI
FATWA QASIM NANOTAWI:
مدد کر اے کرم
احمدی کہ تیرے سوا
نہیں ہے قاسم بے کس کا کوئی حامی کار
نہیں ہے قاسم بے کس کا کوئی حامی کار
فلک پہ عیسیٰ و
ادریس ہیں تو خیر سہی
زمین پہ جلوہ نما
ہیں احمد مختار
(قصائد قاسمی، ص٧)
Translation:
“Help me O blessings of
Ahmed; that there is no supporter of the powerless Qasim other than you.
It is okay that Jesus
and Idrees are on the heaven! On the earth is present Ahmed the authoritative
(Ahmed e Mukhtaar).”
(Qasaaid-e-Qasmi, page 7)
FATWA OF ASHRAF ALI THANVI:
“Calling someone from
far away, thinking him to be proficient of listening, thinking someone to be
authoritative over any profit or loss (Nafa’ Nuqsaan ka Mukhtar), fulfilling
one’s own wishes from someone, and also saying ‘if ALLAH and Messenger wills’;
so all these are polytheism.”
(Bahishti Zewar, page 35)
HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB VS ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIF OF HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB:
جہاز امت کا حق نے کردیا ہے آپ کے ہاتھوں
تم اب چاہو ڈباؤ یا تراؤ یا رسول اللہ
پھنسا ہے بے طرح گرد اب غم میں ناخدا ہوکر
میری کشتی کنارے پر لگاؤ یا رسول اللہ
تم اب چاہو ڈباؤ یا تراؤ یا رسول اللہ
پھنسا ہے بے طرح گرد اب غم میں ناخدا ہوکر
میری کشتی کنارے پر لگاؤ یا رسول اللہ
(نالہ امداد غریب مناجات،
صفحہ ۱۷)
Translation:
“ALLAH has given the
yatch of Ummah into your hands; now either sink it or land it if you
wish, O Messenger of ALLAH!
Now I’ve stuck around
grief badly as a captain of boat; land my boat O Messenger of ALLAH!”
(Nalaa-e-Imdad Ghareeb
Munaajaat, page 17)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“Even disbelievers
never considered their idols more than ALLAH. They too considered them to be
creation of ALLAH. But the same was their infidelity and polytheism i.e.
begging them for needs, gathering of Nazr-o-Nias, calling upon them,
considering them their advocates and intercessors. So if one does the same,
even if considers them the creation of LORD, still him and Abu Jahal are equal
in polytheism.”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page 8)
ATAULLAH BUKHARI VS AHMED ALI LAHORI
BELIEF OF ATAULLAH BUKHARI:
In Monthly
Tajalli-e-Deoband April 1957, ‘Aamir Usmani Deobandi writes: one person copied
a couplet of Ataullah Bukhari and asked Ahmed Ali Lahori (without mentioned the
originator’s name) how this couplet is and what about its writer?
The couplet was:
ز کاف کعبہ تا کاف کراچی
سراسر کفر و کفر دون کفر
سراسر کفر و کفر دون کفر
Translation:
“From the ‘K’ of Ka’ba
to the ‘K’ of Karachi; everything is rejection, rejection or less rejection!”
(Khutbaat Ahraar Sawaata’l
Ilhaam)
AHMED ALI LAHORI THEN REPLIED:
“This couplet is too
much shoddy and condemned. The writer is deficient of understanding, is brother
of Moudoodi the blind and defected, ill-fortuned, truly hypocrite, pulls out
the things (wrongly) like Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiyani did. Rebuffs the granted,
(thus) is an untrue Muslim!”
(Monthly Tajalli-e-Deoband
April 1957, page 30; and other newspapers)
BELIEFS OF SIR SYED AHMED KHAN
BY ASHRAF ALI THANVI:
“This all appalling
outcome is due to the English teachings and preaching of his ominous faith of
‘Nature’ that has changed people’s beliefs, looks, deeds and completely
destroyed the faith; the colour of his ‘Natural’ faith and liberated ideology
and heresy buff on style of living, sitting, standing, eating, drinking, in
fact every activity (of people).”
(Al-Ifaadaatul Youmia, vol
6, page 98, discourse 132, by Moulvi Ashraf Ali Thanvi)
FATWA OF ASHRAF ALI THANVI:
In a discussion, said
that several heresies have been spread by Sir Syed in Indo-Pak. This “Natural”
is the ladder and the root of stupidity and losing the way of religion. The
next branches have originated from it; this Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiyani was the
first who was ambushed in this ‘Natural’ who left behind his teacher Sir Syed
and went so ahead that became claimant of prophethood.
(Al-Ifaadaatul Youmia, vol
5, page 106, discourse 181)
BY MR. HAALI PANIPATI:
1 – Consensus
of Ummah is not valid verification for Shari’ah.
2
– Qiyas (comparison) by Imams (Jurists) is not the verification
of Shari’ah.
3 - To follow (Taqleed)
Imams (Great Jurists) is not essential.
4 – The word “Iblees”
and “Shaytan” used in Qur’aan doesn’t mean any individual. It only refers inner
self of man that does not let him do any good deed, or “Iblees” is the name of
power of doing wrong (not reality, just imagination).
5 – It’s allowed to eat
the sparrows that have been throttled by Christians.
6 –
Whether Mi’raaj (the Elevation) occurred from Makkah to Aqsa Masjid
or from Aqsa Masjid to the heavens; it has nothing to do with insomnia (in
reality). All that happened in the dream, and
similarly Shaq-e-Sadr (dissection of chest) also turned out in dream.
7 – Angels are not a
separate existence, instead the power of current to attract or repel, strength
of mountains, flow of water, growth of trees such powers are labeled as
‘angels’.
8 – The incident of
Adam (the Man), Angels and Iblees which is told in Qur’aan, no such incident
actually occurred but that is only a (fictional) example.
9 – Resurrection after
death, consequence and judgment, the measurement, the Paradise and the Hell;
all are dependent on mind’s eye (imaginary) and not the realism.
10 – It is impossible
to see the LORD whether via original eyes or mind’s eyes, then what to say
about seeing the LORD in life or hereafter!
11 – Qur’aan Kareem
doesn’t tell about any miracle happened by Hazrat Muhammad (SalALLAHu alaihi
waAlihi wassalam).
12 – The verdict in
Qur’aan Kareem about cutting the hands of thief, it’s not essential to be
followed… etc, etc.
(Hayaat-e-Javed, by Mr.
Haali Panipati, part 2, page 256-263)
In Hayaat-e-Javed, page 184, Mr. Haali has quoted Sir Syed as follows:
“Wahabi is the person
who worships ALLAH and is faithful….. The (British) Government has not taken
Wahabis as ‘Mu’tamid Alaih’ (trustworthy to them) without judgment, instead
their loyalty was judged in Ghard war of 1857 when the fire of disputes was on
its peak everywhere (against British) and that these (Wahabis) remained firm in
loyalty to (British) Government.”
BY ANWAR KAASHMIRI SHAYK UL HADEES
OF DEOBAND:
“Sir Syed is faithless,
heretic, ignorant and misguided.”
(Taimiyatul Bayanatul
Mushkilaatul Qur’aan, page 320 by Moulvi Anwar Kaashmiri)
SHIBLI NOUMANI VS ANWAR KAASHMIRI, ASHRAF ALI THANVI & KIFAYATULLAH DEHLVI:
BELIEF OF SHIBLI NOUMANI:
“Actual religion of
“ARSTU” is that the universe is Qadeem (Old and self-created, not
created by ALLAH).
(Kitaabul Kalaam, page 3)
“We do not deny that
the parts of the universe are made by someone with special powers. But we admit
the universe is Qadeem (Old and self-created) as it is opinion of one
contradictory sect of Muslims i.e. Mu’tazili and is opinion of some
leaders of Islam i.e. Faaraabi, Ibn e Sina, Ibn e Rushd etc.”
(Kitaabul Kalaam, page 54,
by Moulvi Shibli Noumani A’zam-Garhhi, who is also the author of ‘Seerat e
Nabawi’)
ASHRAF ALI THANVI SAYS:
“This Noumani (Shibli
of A’zam-Garhh) is also on the footsteps of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, he has written
“Seerat-e-Nabawi” to which ‘Naturies (followers of Sir Syed)’ respect deeply.”
(Al-Ifaadaatul Youmia, vol
5, page 152, under discourse 255, by Ashraf Ali Thanvi)
“And everybody knows
what happened to this (Nadviyat of Nadvi Deobandis e.g. Sulaiman Nadvi and
current Abul Hasan Nadvi). It was same, having same thoughts, same passions,
and same pace as that of ‘Natural’ (of Sir Syed), there was no difference.”
(Al-Ifaadaatul Youmia, vol
5, page 110, under discourse 118, by Ashraf Ali Thanvi)
“Upshot of the Nadvi
religion is that one who recites Kalimah (declaration) is a Muslim no
matter if he calls ALLAH as a liar, or says Qur’aan is imperfect, whether
considers Hazrat Muhammad (salALLAHu alaihi wa’Alayhi wassalam) as Last Prophet
from ALLAH or not, believes on day of resurrection or not, believes in Heaven
or Hell or not. Reciting Kalimah is enough for him; then he is the
member of Nadva.”
FATWA OF KIFAYATULLAH:
In 1332 Hijri, Deobandi
scholar Moulvi Kifayatullah wrote a pamphlet “Tohfa Hindiyah” in refutation of Shibli Noumani and
published it from the Dehli Press. He says in that:
“Allama Shibli is
expelled out of Ahlesunnah Wa Jamaa’at, he is collaborator
of Mu’tazili sect and faithless people of past, instead he is their
representative in 14th century.”
(With reference to:
Tawareekh-e-Mujaddid-e-Hizb-e-Wahabia, page 23)
FATWA OF ANWAR KAASHMIRI:
“I demonstrate this
faithlessness and insolence of Shibli Noumani to people because in Islam it is
not allowed to hide infidel’s infidelity.”
(Muqaddima Muskilaatul
Qur’aan, page 32, by Moulvi Anwar Kaashmiri Deobandi)
HUSSAIN AHMED CONGRESSY VS KHALEEL AMBETHWI
BELIEF OF HUSSAIN AHMED CONGRESSY:
“Possession over a
special knowledge is not given to the Holy Prophet (Peace and blessings of ALLAH
be upon him), but is given to Iblees (Satan the rejected one, curse of ALLAH be
upon him).”
(Shahaab-e-Thaaqib, page
113)
FATWA OF KHALEEL AMBETHWI:
“The person who
equalizes Prophet’s knowledge to Zaid o Bakr, insanes, children or animals is
purely an infidel.”
(Almuhannad, page 36)
MR. ABUL KALAAM AAZAAD CONGRESSY VS ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF ABDUL KALAAM AAZAAD:
“I myself was not only
a blind conformist (blind Muqallid) of Sir Syed, but I used to worship him
with the label of conformation (Taqleed).”
(Aazaad ki Kahani, page
384)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“Muslim should not
follow or make conformation (Taqleed) of any jurist until issue is clear from
Qur’aan and Sunnah. Must keep starving and investigating.”
(Tazkeerul Ikhwan Baqiya
Taqwiyatul Imaan, page 212)
“To
think Taqleed is enough for Muqallid (conformist) and not
to consider self-investigation to be necessary, this belief is counted among
infidelities.”
(Tazkeerul Ikhwan, page
88)
MEHMOOD UL HASAN DEOBANDI VS ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF MEHMOOD UL HASAN
DEOBANDI:
Mehmood ul Hasan
considered it necessary to have a teacher for understanding Qur’aan and Hadith,
so while praising Qasim Nanotawi and Rasheed Gangohi he writes:
پر نہ ہوں سائق و قائد جو رشید و قاسم
ہم کو کیوں کر ملیں یہ نعمت یزداں دونوں
کون سمجھائے ہمیں مطلب اللہ و رسول
کون سکھائے ہمیں سنت وقرآن دونوں
ہم کو کیوں کر ملیں یہ نعمت یزداں دونوں
کون سمجھائے ہمیں مطلب اللہ و رسول
کون سکھائے ہمیں سنت وقرآن دونوں
(قصیدہ محمود الحسن، صفحہ اول)
Translation:
“Why have we got both
the gifts of ALLAH i.e. Rasheed and Qasim when there isn’t Saaiq and Quaid?
Who will teach us the
meaning ALLAH and the Messenger, who will teach us both the Qur’aan andSunnah?”
(Qaseedah Mehmood ul
Hasan, page 1)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“One, after listening
to the Qur’aanic verse “And undoubtedly, We sent down towards you manifest
Signs; and none would be denying them but the disobedient”, says that nobody
can understand the Prophet’s saying and nobody can act upon them except pious
people and saints is denying this verse (which is infidelity).”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page 3)
ASHRAF ALI THANVI VS RAHSEED GANGOHI & ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF ASHRAF ALI THANVI:
“What is the specialty
of the Prophet (salALLAHu alaihi walayhi wassalam) in certain aspects of
knowledge of unseen? Even Zaid, Umar (every Tom, Dick and Harry), rather every
insane and children, also all animals and wild creatures are having such
knowledge of unseen.”
(Hifzul Imaan, page 8, by
Ahsraf Ali Thanvi)
FATWA OF RASHEED GANGOHI:
“This belief that the
Prophet had knowledge of unseen is obvious Polytheism (Shirk).”
(Fatawa-e-Rasheediya, part
2, page 10)
“Knowledge of unseen is
special to ALLAH only; applying this word with any interpretation to someone is
not free from polytheism.”
(Fatawa-e-Rasheediya, part
3, page 37)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“Whether he considers
this knowledge to be known by Prophet on his own or by the grace of ALLAH; yet
by all means polytheism is proved in this belief.”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page
10)
KHALEEL AMBETHWI VS RASHEED GANGOHI
BELIEF OF KHALEEL AMBETHWI:
“Conclusively, we must
ponder over that after seeing the status of knowledge of Iblees (Satan) and
Malakul Mout (Angel of death), proving knowledge of unseen for the pride of
universe (Prophet, Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) without any
authentic evidence (Nass), is against obvious Nass (evidently authentic
sources in Islam); if this is not polytheism then what part of the faith is it?
(Meaning, it is absolute polytheism). Vast Knowledge for Seraph of death and
Satan is assured with Nass, but where it is inevitably proved
from Nass (Qur’aan and Sunnah) for the pride of worlds (Hazrat
Muhammad, salALLAHu alaihi walayhi wassalam), through which
all Nusoos are rejected and only polytheism is proven.”
(Baraheen-e-Qaati’ah, page
51)
FATWA OF RASHEED GANGOHI:
“Molana Rasheed
Gangohi, in various judicial decrees, has declared him to be infidel who says
Iblees’ knowledge is more than Prophet’s (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon
him).”
(With refrence to:
Shahaab-e-Thaaqib, page 109 by Hussain Ahmed Congressy)
HUSSAIN AHMED CONGRESSY VS RASHEED GANGOHI
BELIEF OF PRESIDENT OF DEOBAND
HUSSAIN AHMED CONGRESSY:
“Possession over a
special knowledge is not given to the Holy Prophet (Peace and blessings of
ALLAH be upon him), but is given to Iblees (Satan the rejected one, curse of
ALLAH be upon him).”
(Shahaab-e-Thaaqib, page
113)
FATWA OF RASHEED AHMED:
“Molana Rasheed
Gangohi, in various judicial decrees, has declared him to be infidel who says
Iblees’ knowledge is more than Prophet’s (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon
him).”
(With refrence to:
Shahaab-e-Thaaqib, page 109)
ISMAIL DEHLVI VS ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“Don’t think such thing
that assisting the dead by reciting Fatiha and feeding is a bad
thing. Instead it’s preferred and much appreciated.”
(Siraat-e-Mustaqeem, page
73)
“In traditional acts
like to recite Fatiha, to celebrate Urs (anniversary of a late
saint), to do Nazr-Niaz (gathering for Esal-e-Thawab) for dead
people; there is no doubt in greatness of these traditions.”
(Siraat-e-Mustaqeem, page
63)
WAY OF FATIHA IN CHISHTIA SILSILA:
“First the devotee
should do ablution, and sit on knees as in Prayer. And then pray to ALLAH by
reciting Fatiha in name of great nobles of the Chishti Series i.e
Khwaja Moeen-ud-Deen Sanjari and Hazrat Qutb-ud-Deen Bakhtiyar Kaki; and being
too much meek and submissive, pray to ALLAH with
their Waseelah (medium) for solution of difficulty. Then start doing
‘dou zarbi zikr’.”
(Siraat-e-Mustaqeem, page
122)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI AGAINST HIS OWN
BELIEF:
“The same was their
infidelity and polytheism i.e. begging them for needs, gathering
of Nazr-o-Nias, calling upon them, considering them their advocates and
intercessors. So if one does the same, even if considers them the creation of
LORD, still him and Abu Jahal are equal in polytheism.”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page 8)
AYUB KHAN & EHTISHAMUL HAQ THANVI
VS
ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF FORMER PRESIDENT AYUB
KHAN & EHTISHAMUL HAQ DEOBANDI:
“Today’s evening in
Karachi 31st July, President of Nation Muhammad Ayub Khan laid the foundation
stone of Quaid-e-A’zam’s mausoleum. Moulvi Ehtishamul Haq Thanvi, while
addressing, paid tribute to President Ayub, and expressed gratitude to him for
taking personal interest in building mausoleum of Quaid-e-A’zam. He said
‘laying down foundation stone for Quaid’s tomb by President Ayub, an old desire
of Pakistani people will be fulfilled’. He (Ehtishamul Haq Thanvi) said
‘although Quaid is dead but will remain alive on basis of his thoughts and
fundamental ideologies’.
(Daily Kohistan, Lahore
1st August 1960)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“People covering the
graves with cloth (and putting flowers), writing dates and making mausoleum on
them are not Muslims. Making tomb/mausoleum on grave is forbidden whosoever’s
grave is it.”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan ma’a
Tazkeerul Ikhwaan, page 84)
ASHRAF ALI THANVI & ABDUL MAJEED ASHRAFI VS ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF ASHRAF ALI THANVI &
ABDUL MAJEED ASHRAFI:
دستگیری کیجئے
میرے
نبی
کشمکش میں ہوں تم ہی میرے ولی
جز تمہارے ہے کہاں میری پناہ
فوج کلفت مجھ پہ آ غالب ہوئی
ابن عبداللہ زمانہ ہے خلاف
اے میرے مولا خبر لیجئے میری
کشمکش میں ہوں تم ہی میرے ولی
جز تمہارے ہے کہاں میری پناہ
فوج کلفت مجھ پہ آ غالب ہوئی
ابن عبداللہ زمانہ ہے خلاف
اے میرے مولا خبر لیجئے میری
(نشرالطیب، از اشرف علی تھانوی)
Translation:
“Do assistance, my Prophet; only you are my friend that I’m
indecisive.
Where is my shelter
except for yours; the army of grief has invaded me.
O my master Ibn
Abdullah! The era is against me, have my acquaintance.”
(Nashrut Teeb, by Ashraf
Ali Thanvi)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHAVLI:
“Whoever proves
Tasarruf (possession) of any creation in the universe and thinks him to be advocate
for him then polytheism is applied to him even if he doesn’t consider him to be
equal to ALLAH.”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page
32, by Moulvi Ismail Dehlvi)
AHMED ALI LAHORI VS AHMED ALI LAHORI
BELIEF OF AHMED ALI LAHORI:
“Listen! I use to say
if you name yourself as Maadhu Singh, Ganga Raam; offer five times prayer, give
annual charity thoroughly, perform pilgrimage if it is obligated on you, fast
thirty days of Ramadan, then I give the judicial decree (Fatwa) that he is an
absolutely true Muslim.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
Shaykhut Tafseer Number)
FATWA OF AHMED ALI AGAINST HIS OWN
SELF:
“If one names himself
as Abdullah Jaan, Muhammad Deen, ALLAH Rakha, and Muhammad Jaan, but does not
offer any prayer, does not fast in Ramadan, never performs pilgrimage even if
obligatory, never gives annual charity then I give this judicial decree (Fatwa)
that he is absolutely true infidel.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, 22nd
February 1963, page 42)
AHMED ALI LAHORI VS AHMED ALI LAHORI
BELIEF OF AHMED ALI LAHORI:
“O Lahories! I tell you
that Muslims of Lahore are the one praising evil ladies (Kanjari-Nawaz). Now,
do only Sikhs go in Heera Mandi? Or someone else goes? All the Muslims go
there!”
(Khuddaam-e-Deen, Lahore,
22nd Feburary 1963)
FATWA OF AHMED ALI AGAINST HIS OWN
SELF:
“I say that Lahore is
city of faithless people. Most of them are shameless, worshippers of evil
ladies and perform prostitution.”
(Khuddaam-e-Deen, Lahore,
Feburary 1963)
MRS. MOUDOODI VS MR. MOUDOODI:
MRS. MOUDOODI IN GATHERING OF
MEELAD:
“A few days ago, there
was a gathering of Meelad held under the supervision of Mrs. Dr. Abbas Ali in
Ladies Club Model Town. Besides reciting Durood Shareef and commemorating the
Prophet (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him), Mrs. Moudoodi made a
consistent speech regarding the ladies how they should make their lives
according to Islam.”
(Daily Mashriq, 26/11/65)
FATWA OF MR. MOUDOODI ON MEELAD:
“This celebration which
is associated to Prophet (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) is actually
not an Islamic celebration. It has no validation in
Islam. Sahabah (May ALLAH be pleased with them all) too never
celebrated this day. Alas! This day has been made as Diwali and Sehra.”
(Weekly Qandeel, Lahore,
3rd July 1966)
AHMED ALI LAHORI VS AHMED ALI LAHORI
BELIEF OF AHMED ALI LAHORI:
“He (Ahmed Ali Lahori)
used to forgive everyone but never forgave polytheist and the one spreading
innovation.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
March 1963, page 13)
FATWA OF AHMED ALI AGAINST HIS OWN
SELF:
“Once on the invitation
of Maulana Dawood Ghaznavi (Ghair Muqallid Wahabi) there was a meeting at his
Madarasa Sheesh Mahal. Hazrat (Ahmed Ali) was already seated. Mr. Moudoodi and
Maulana Abul Hasanaat (Barelvi) came afterwards. Hazrat (Ahmed Ali) stood up
for every one of them and embraced them.
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, 8 March
1963, page 12)
ISMAIL DEHLVI & RASHEED GANGOHI VS OTHER DEOBANDI ELDERS
BELIEF OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“We don’t say it’s
impossible for ALLAH to tell Lie.”
(Yakrozi, page 145)
“If ALLAH could not
tell lie then it would definitely be concluded that man has more power than
ALLAH.”
(Yakrozi, page 145)
BELIEF OF RASHEED GANGOHI:
“Maulana Gangohi,
merely following Maulana Shaheed (Ismail Dehlvi), agreed on the matter of
possibility of Lie. This quote of him is sheer blame and pretentious assertion.
Maulana Gangohi has followed the great late nobles.”
(Shahaab-e-Thaaqib page
102)
FATWA OF DEOBANDI INTELLECTUALS:
“It is said that near
both (Dehlvi and Gangohi), ALLAH can be Liar or Truthless and it is possible
that there is lie in the Book of ALLAH (ALLAH forbid!); but this is false and
mere fib and our nobles (scholars) never accepted such belief…. Instead,
consider and declare such person infidel and Zoroastrian.”
(Shahaab-e-Thaaqib, page
105)
FIRDOUS QUSOORI VS KHALEEL AMBETHWI
BELIEF OF FIRDOUS QUSOORI:
“Commemoration of
blessed birth of RasoolULLAH (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him), rather
commemoration of blessed dust of his shoes is significantly desirable act.”
(Chiraagh-e-Sunnat, page
127)
FATWA OF KHALEEL AMBETHWI:
“Every day this
commemoration of birth (of Prophet) is similar to Hindus who celebrate birth of
Saang Kanhaiya each year.”
(Baraheen-e-Qaati’ah, page
148)
AHMED ALI LAHORI VS ISMAIL DEHLVI
CLAIM OF KNOWLEDGE OF UNSEEN
(GHAIB) AND KASHF BY AHMED ALI:
“I’m deeply convinced
by the greatness and high calibre of the saints, influenced by the piety and
spirituality of those saints more than the so called Pirs and Pirzadas of
today. Sitting with the saints, with grace of ALLAH, I have got that much power
that I can see as to what’s happening with dead person in grave.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen,
Feburary 22nd, 1963)
“Listen! Be conscious!
ALLAH has blessed me with the internal eyes. I know the youngsters who used to
swear the scholars obedient to English Government and died; their (youngsters’)
graves have become pit of Hell. If you don’t believe then come on, sit with me!
I have learnt this art in over forty years, I will teach you in four years.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen,
Feburary 22nd 1963, page 41)
Marvel: “Once Ahmed Ali
was going to Dood-Chak, an old and simple mausoleum came in the way. When his
cart stepped ahead, he said ‘Moulvi Basheer Ahmed! This grave is completely
empty’….. I enquired from my dear Pir brother Moulvi Abdul Haq as to whose grave
was that in that perticular circle. He said ‘there was a faithless, drunk,
intoxicated and addicted person in the nearby village that died in a Chak of
district Lailpoor and was also buried therein, but his followers decided to
make a fake grave of their master over here so that they could arrange a yearly
death carnival of him’.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Feburary 22nd 1963, page 35)
“When Moulvi (Shamsul
Haq Afghani) asked Moulvi Ahmed Ali Lahori that if he had visited the shrine of
Maulana Ismail Shaheed (Dehlvi) and Hazrat Syed Sahib, resident of Bareilly, in
Balakot. He said ‘Yes! Maulana Abdul Hannan of Rawalpindi took me’. Moulvi
(Shamsul Haq) Afghani asked ‘Sir! What is the reason that Syed Ahmed’s, who is
leader and guide, grave seems lower to the grave of Ismail Shaheed (Dehlvi). He
replied ‘Yes! The story is this that I (Lahori) asked the dweller of grave, he
said he is not Syed Ahmed Shaheed but his name is Syed Ahmed, he was not the
guide of Maulana Shaheed (Ismail Dehlvi), while being near to him people
started thinking me as Syed Ahmed Shaheed’.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
Shaykut Tafseer number, page 44)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLAVI:
“Whatever ALLAH will do
with His creation, whether in grave or in hereafter, it is only known to Him.
Nobody else knows its reality, neither Prophet nor saint, (creation) neither
(knows) his own situation nor of someone else.”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page
27)
“Polytheism desecrates
all the devotions and the ones claiming for Kashf (spiritualism) are
victim of it.”
AHMED ALI LAHORI VS AHMED ALI LAHORI
SAYING OF AHMED ALI LAHORI:
“I don’t say badly to
anyone. Those people who label the ones who do not believe on Khatam
Shareef and Giyarwi Shareef (gathering
of Esal-e-Thawab especially on 11th of Islamic month) as Wahabis, I
want their welfare too.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen Feburary
22nd 1963, page 41)
ACTION OF AHMED ALI LAHORI:
“I am a definite
Hanafi. In Lahore, many rituals have been invented. Prostrating to
graves, Qawaliare found everywhere [*]. When I oppose these people,
then they call me Wahabi. Devil is very treacherous and cursed; he has made
faithless as faithful and faithful one as the faithless!”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
Feburary 22nd, 1963)
[*] A’la Hazrat
Imam Ahmed Raza Khan Fadil-e-Barelvi has strictly prohibited from prostration
of graves and Qawali in Zubdatul-Zakiah and Ahkam-e Shari’at
and Masaail-e-Samaa’ as such till date no Wahabi has said so.
“I advise you that
after my death do not get indulged in innovating and grave-worshipping Pir and
do not get misguided.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
22nd Feburary 1963)
AHMED ALI LAHORI VS DEOBANDI MAGAZINE:
AHMED ALI CLAIMS:
“I’m a definite Hanafi.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
Shaykut Tafseer number, page 41)
THE SAME DEOBANDI MAGAZINE DEGRADES
IMAM-E-A’ZAM ABU HANIFAH:
It has clear antagonism
for Imam Abu Hanifah:
“I have never found a
high ranked scholar and Muhadith from Syria till India equal to
status of him (Anwar Kaashmiri)….. If I swear that this (Anwar Kaashmiri) is
the scholar higher in rank than Imam-e-A’zam Abu Hanifah then I will not be a
liar in my claim.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
18th December 1964)
SAUDI KING SHAH FAISAL VS GHULAM KHAN & ISMAIL DEHLVI
BELIEF OF SHAH FAISAL:
“22 April Lahore (chief
reporter): Shah Faisal of Saudi Arabia, while addressing at dinner from
Anjuman-e-Himayat-e-Islam, advised the workers to keep holding fast the rope of
ALLAH, and let there be no lethargy in their good deeds. ALLAH and His
Messenger (SalALLAHu Alahihi wasallam) are watching your deeds.”
(Daily Nawa-e-Waqt, 1st
Muharammul Haraam 1386 Hijri)
FATWA OF GHULAM KHAN:
“One perceiving Prophet
to be present and witnessing is infidel without any doubt.”
(Jawaahirl Qur’aan, page
6)
“One not calling him infidel and polytheist is
himself an infidel as such.”
(Jawaahirul Qur’aan, page
77)
FATWA OF ISMAIL DEHLVI:
“Whether he considers
the power of these acts (for the Prophets and saints) to be granted from ALLAH
or by their own, is polytheism by all ways.”
(Taqwiyatul Imaan, page
10)
‘AAMIR USMANI VS KHALEEL AMBETHWI:
BELIEF OF ‘AAMIR USMANI EDITOR OF
TAJALLI-E-DEOBAND:
“It’s my thorough and
definite opinion that the Muslim indulging in an open sin is far better than
that Muslim who participates in innovations like “Eid Meelad-un-Nabi”
(commemoration of birth of Holy Prophet) with having respect for it. Look!
Cinema is an open sin, millions of Muslims attend it, but to people in circles
of piousness this thought has not been developed to close the eyes to good
deeds. But this commemoration and other innovations has got the place of
blessing near numerous scholars and nobles. This is known as “Tahreef fid-Deen”
(fabrication in the religion). This is such way of sin that has no hope for
return.”
(Almuneer, Lailpoor, 2nd
Jamaad-ul-Awwal 1383 Hijri)
FATWA OF KHALEEL AMBETHVI:
“We and our elder
scholars consider it an infidelty to insult the blessed shoes of the Prophet
(Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him), and also use of the words which
offend his blessed birth.”
(Almuhannad ‘Alal
Mufannad, page 46)
IN’AAM KAREEM VS GHULAM KHAN
IN’AAM KAREEM, NEPHEW OF MEHMOOD UL
HASAN DEOBANDI, SAYS:
“The date when Lahore
was attacked (in 1965), that night two to three persons saw in dream that there
was a big gathering at the blessed Masjid ‘Raudah’ of Prophet of ALLAH
(SalALLAHu Alaihi Wasallam). Then suddenly saw Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa (Peace
and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) seated on a beautiful speedy horse hurrying
towards the Gate of Safety (Baabus Salam). Some people asked ‘O Prophet! Where
are you going?’ He (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) said ‘to the
warfare in Pakistan’. Then he suddenly disappeared as a lightning.”
(Daily Amrooz, Multan,
15th Jaddil Akhiri, 85 Hijri; Nawa-e-Waqt, 10 October 1956)
FATWA OF GHULAM KHAN:
“When all creations are
destitute then how can one be giving and helper and solver of difficulties
(Hajat-Rawa aur Mushkil-Kusha)? People having such faith are sheer infidels and
have no (valid) nuptial.”
(Jawaahirul Qur’aan, page
147)
DEOBAND VS DEOBAND
ABOUT IBN ABDUL WAHAB NAJDI:
KHALEEL AHMED AMBETHWI AGAINST
NAJDI:
“It was his (Ibn Abdul
Wahab Najdi’s) belief that only they are Muslims, whoever is against them is
polytheist. On this basis, he had considered slaughter of the Ahle Sunnah and
their scholars as lawful.”
(Almuhannad, page 13)
Note: This book has signatures of prominent
scholars of Deoband e.g. Mehmood-ul-Hasan Deobandi and Moulvi Ashraf Ali
Thanvi.
HUSSAIN AHMED CONGRESSY AGAINST
NAJDI:
“1. It was belief of
Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi that all Ahle Sunnat and Muslims all over the
world are infidels and polytheists, therefore it is permissible and legal
rather it is essential to kill them all, get hold of their belongings (e.g
assets, women, children etc.).
2. He calls it
shameless innovation and forbidden to visit the holy shrine of the Messenger
(SalALLAHu Alaihi Wasallam), to present into the blessed court and to see the
sacred mausoleum/tomb.
3. Wahabis use
extremely disrespectful words in status of Prophet (Peace and blessings of
ALLAH be upon him). Consider praying through mediation (Waseelah) of the
Prophet, after his death, as unlawful. It’s the dialect of their elders to say
that twig of their hand can benefit them more than the entity of Prophet (Peace
and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) through which they could keep away the dogs
while through the entity of the pride of universe (Peace and blessings of ALLAH
is upon him) even this much couldn’t be done.
4. These malignant
rascal Wahabis consider salutations, greetings upon the Prophet (Durood bar
Khairul Anam), recitation of
(book) Dalaail-ul-Khairaat and Qasidah Burdah and
(Qasidah)Hamzia, detestable, too vile and odious. Conclusively, he (Ibn Abdul
Wahab Najdi) was a tyrant, rebellion and bloody mutineer man.”
(Shahaab-e-Thaaqib, page
50-52 by Moulvi Hussain Ahmed Congressy, President of Madarasa-e-Deoband)
ANWAR KAASHMIRI AGAINST NAJDI:
“Muhammad Bin Abdul
Wahab Najdi was a less knowledgeable and a nonsense man, that’s why he had no
apprehension in passing on a decree (Fatwa) of infidelity
(making Takfeer).”
(Muqaddima Faiz-ul-Bari,
page 171, by Moulvi Anwar Kaashmiri)
QARI MUHAMMAD TAYYAB DEOBANDI
AGAINST NAJDI:
“He never felt any
anxiety in declaring many legal and authentic things as prohibited.”
(Mahnama Darul Uloom
Deoband, Feburary 1963, page 41, Muhtamim Madarasa-e-Deoband Qari Tayyab)
BUT RASHEED AHMED GANGOHI LOVES NAJDI AND HIS ACTS:
“Followers of Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab are called Wahabis. His beliefs were excellent and his
jurisprudence was Hambali.”
(Fatawa-e-Rasheediya, page
8, volume 1)
“Muhammad Bin Abdul
Wahab….. He was a follower of Hadith, used to stop innovation and
polytheism.”
(Fatawa-e-Rasheediya, page
178)
DECISION OF MURTAZA HASAN DARBHANGI CHANDPURI
“If some scholars of
Deoband were really as they were according to (Maulana Ahmed Raza) Khan
(Barelvi) Sahib then proving them infidel (making their Takfeer) was
obligatory for Khan Sahib. If he would not call them infidel he himself would
have become infidel. Similarly as when the corrupt beliefs of Mirza (Qadiyani)
were known and became evident to scholars of Islam, it became obligatory for
them to prove and call Qadiyanis and Mirza Sahib as infidel and disbeliever, if
otherwise they didn’t call Mirza or Qadiyanis as infidel then they themselves,
whether them be Lahoris or Qadiyanis etc., would become infidel and
disbeliever, because one who doesn’t call an infidel as infidel is himself an
infidel.
(Ashadul ‘Azaab, page 13)
ALLAH in the name
of, the Most Beneficent, Merciful
Salutations be
upon his the last Prophet Muhammad SalALLAHu alaihi wa’Alayhi wassalam.
ستارے جھلملا کے
زیر دامان سحر آئے
ابھی تک جاگتا ہوں کہ شائد فتنہ گر آئے
ابھی تک جاگتا ہوں کہ شائد فتنہ گر آئے
ANSWER TO OBJECTIONS ON TAKFEERI AFSANA:
Deobandis have accepted
43 out of 48 Takfeers from their “Takfeeri Afsana (whose English is
Deoband Vs Deoband)”. It was a death letter to all Deobandi Wahabis. Great loss
to Deobandis can be imagined through this that this small pamphlet (Takfeeri Afsana)
has been printed and published since 35 years. Open challenges and letters were
sent to the Deobandi scholars and have been sent many times, but they could not
make any answer for a long period of time. This pamphlet (Takfeeri Afsana)
stood fast in their throat as the bifurcated twig. Wherever this pamphlet
reached, paper boat of Deobandi’ism drowned. After having a long period of time
in consideration and meticulousness, some professionally so called Deobandi
debaters sat in a conference to save crystal palace of their self-forged
religion from the triumphant bloody slashes of pen of Imam Ahmed Raza Barelvi
(ALLAH’s mercy be upon him), for this some steps were seen. Shaykh ul Qur’aan
of Deobandis Mulla Ghulam Khan, President and Shaykh ul Hadith of Khair ul
Madaaris Shareef Kashmiri and Mulla Abdul Sattar Lailpoori unitedly compiled
and agreed that a diminutive but answer of the Takfeeri Afsana must
be published so that business of sedition and incitement to mischief,
contradiction, misunderstanding and unrest may carry on. Thus, these immatures
decided that they would publish a pamphlet by the name of Mulla Yousuf
Rahmaani.
Therefore, a pamphlet
by the ignorant name of “Saif-e-Rahmaani ‘Ala ‘Anq Raza Khani” appeared at the
scene. It was required that as we posted Takfeeri Afsana to almost all the
well-known scholars of Deoband and challenged for its answer, they should have
sent their answer to us, but this was kept in dark as they knew its quality of
consistency, and they just made people of their own home happy by showing this
so called answer.
At last the answer
reached me through an eminent researcher and Mujaahid of Ahle Sunnat Maulana
Abu Dawood Muhammad Sadiq Rizawi (Mad Zillahul ‘Aali); and after looking at
that it seemed it was ‘Khoda Paharh, Nikla Chooha’ (meaning as a result of
great hardwork they didn’t get any reasonable reply from them). Illiterate
writer and self-written debater of Islam with name Yousuf Rahmaani has provided
good material for mortifying his own scholars. Its answer is being published
separately but as beloved brother Maulana Hafiz Qari Gohar Ali Qaadiri wished
to publish the 4th edition of Takfeeri Afsana so it was thought to
publish the answer to “Saif-e-Rahmaani” which was written in reply of Takfeeri
Afsana in the edition jointly.
PEAK OF SIGHTLESSNESS:
Readers would be amazed
after knowing that self-mentioned debater of Islam Moulvi Yousuf Rahmaani has
diminutively answered 5 out of forty eight (48) statements in Takfeeri
Afsana, namely “Scam of Mulla Muhammad Hasan Ali Rizawi (the compiler
of Takfeer Afsana)” on page 62, “2nd Scam of Mulla Muhammad Hasan” on page
64, “3rd Scam of Mulla Muhammad Hasan” on page 69, “4th Scam of Mulla Hasan” on
page 72, “5th Scam of Mulla Muhammad Hasan” on page 76; as if he has confessed
left over 43 infidelities and contradictions of his elderly scholars. And has
called the five chosen matters as ‘Scam’ (Dajl), but these scams are not of
ours, they are of his own elders and so called scholarly intellectuals. We are
not the writer of this Takfeeri Afsanainstead we are the compilers and
narrator only (of contradictions of Deobandis scholars).
Everything is quoted
from books of the prominent scholars of Deoband. Moulvi Yousuf uses a foul
language for us; whatever ill-manners he show, all goes for his own elders but
this is the peak of sightlessness and tyranny. Writer
of Saif-e-Rahmaani has written in its introduction, page 10-11 that
“Knowledge of Mulla Muhammad Hasan Ali Rizawi Melsi has been exposed right
where he has not started Takfeeri Afsana in the praise of ALLAH and
by sending salutations on Prophet (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him).
It’s stated in Hadith that the effort which has not started ‘in the
name of ALLAH’ or with praise of ALLAH goes in loss and the Devil gets involved
in it.”
While the one who is
not blind like Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi can see clearly with eyes that on the
title page of this Takfeeri Afsana (the Urdu edition) ‘ALLAHu Akbar’
is written and on first page ‘786/92’ is written which means “ALLAH in the name
of the Most Affectionate, the Merciful” and next to it this verse of glorious
Qur’aan is quoted prominently.
“Surely, as to those
who are destined to infidelity, it is alike whether you warn them or warn them
not, they will never believe.”
(Al-Qur’aan, Surah
Baqarah, 2:6)
The very answer can
expose deceit and pretense of writer of so called Saif-e-Rahmaani. After
this, see the answers to his five scams number wise and snicker on the
irrational foolish Deobandi’ism.
DEOBANDI SCAM NO. 1:
“It’s written in bold
letters on page 35 of Takfeeri Afsana ‘Ahmed Ali Lahori’s claim
for Kashf and knowledge of unseen (Ilm-e-Ghaib)’ while Maulana Ahmed
Ali Lahori has only claimed for his Kashf, and Mulla Hasan Ali Melswi
wrote it as knowledge of unseen. How come one who doesn’t know definations,
division and difference between knowledge of unseen
and Kashf understands the statements of scholars? While one who calls
Kashf as knowledge of unseen, scholars have declared him as infidel. See the Fatwa
of Maulana Thanaullah Panipati Hanafi that ‘Saints don’t have knowledge of
unseen. Yes! This can be said that saints get news or Kashf about the
veiled things due to their spiritual sight, and saying that saints have
knowledge of unseen is infidelity’ (Irshaadut Talibeen, page 20, copied from weekly Chattan, 11 March
1963).”
FIRST ANSWER TO SCAM 1:
See Firoz ul Lughaat on page
509 “Kashf” in which it is
written “(it is) masculine, (it means) to open, show of the unseen (Ghaib ka
izhaar)”.
SECOND ANSWER TO SCAM 1:
Illiteracy of Deobandi
the ignorant can be envisioned by the fact that to quote Qazi Thanaullah
Panipati he is the slave of the weekly Chattan. It’s not viable for him to
even quote directly from ‘Irshaadut Talibeen’. Then his claim is this that scholars
have declared him an infidel who calls Kashf as knowledge for unseen,
while actually it’s nowhere found in the quoted statement of Qazi Thanaullah
Panipati. If his own quoted statement mentioned above is seen thoroughly then
surely Fatwa of infidelity is not given on saying Kashf as knowledge
of unseen, instead Fatwa is given on this:
“Saying that Prophets
and saints have knowledge of unseen is infidelity.”
(Saif-e-Rahmaani, page 46,
by Mulla Yousuf Rahmaani Deobandi)
Now where is Fatwa of
infidelity, on the one who says Kashf as knowledge of unseen, in it?
Left over is the Fatwa of infidelity on knowledge of unseen to saints, for that
Qazi Thanaullah means thinking and calling it to be possessed without the grace
of ALLAH then it is infidelity. Even if the writer insists that considering one
who believes knowledge of unseen for saints is infidel in any case then we will
say that this verdict of writer of Saif-e-Rahmaani fits upon Haji
Imdadullah Makki Sahib who is spiritual guide of his elderly scholars like
Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi and Asharf Ali Thanvi. See, he says:
“People say that
Prophets and saints don’t have knowledge of unseen, I say to whom bona fide
people look at they have perception and visualization of unseens.”
(Shumaim-e-Imdadiya, vol
2, page 61)
یوں نظر دوڑے نہ برچھی تان کر
اپنے بیگانے ذرا پہچان کر
اپنے بیگانے ذرا پہچان کر
DEOBANDI SCAM NO. 2:
“Mulla Muhammad Hasan
Ali Rizawi has quoted two couplets of Maulana Haji Imdadullah Muhajir Makki
which he pleaded to his spiritual leader Khwaja Noor Muhammad Sahib in state of
unconsciousness/possessed and zest (Wajd o Zouq), those are:
تم مدد گار مدد، امداد کو پھر خوف کیا
عشق کی پر سن کے باتیں کانپتے ہیں دست و پا
عشق کی پر سن کے باتیں کانپتے ہیں دست و پا
اے شہ نور محمد ،وقت ہے امداد کا
آسرا دنیا میں ہے از بس تمہاری ذات کا
(تکفیری افسانہ، صفحہ۵)
Translation:
“You are, O Noor
Muhammad, the remarkably beloved of ALLAH; you are the deputy of Hazrat
Muhammad Mustafa (SalALLAHu Alaihi Wasallam) in India.
You are the helper then
what to worry for assistance; but hands and feet shiver when hear
communications of love (‘Ishq).
O master Noor Muhammad!
This is the time for assistance; the only reliance in the world is your
personality.”
(Takfeeri Afsana, page 5)
In competition to these
he (Hasan Ali Rizawi) has quoted the couplets of killer of polytheist Maulana
Ismail Shaheed which he alleged for other normal matters and not for the state
of Wajd o Sukr(unconsciousness and oblivion). Maulana Ismail Shaheed’s
statement is as followed:
تجھ سوا مانگے جو غیروں سے مدد
فی الحقیقت ہے وہی مشرک اشد
فی الحقیقت ہے وہی مشرک اشد
دوسرا اس سا نہیں دنیا میں بد
ہے گلے میں اس کے حبل من مسد
سب سے اس پر لعنت و پھٹکار ہے
مردوں سے حاجتیں مانگنا اور ان کی منتیں مننا کفار کی راہ ہے
(تکفیر افسانہ، صفحہ۵)
Translation:
“One who asks help from
others; in reality he is extreme Mushrik (polytheist).
There is no other evil
like him in the world; there is ‘a rope of palm fiber’ in its neck.
Curse and damnation be
on him from all; to plead dead and beg for necessities is the way of pagans.”
(Takfeeri Afsana, page 5)
Deobandi Interpretation 1:
“If there came any
difficult and complicated issue, Maulana Imdadullah Muhajir Makki used to solve
that academic trouble and difficulty by asking his guide Haji Noor Muhammad.”
(Saif-e-Rahmaani, page 65)
Deobandi Interpretation 2:
“Those are couplets of
Maulana Imdadullah Muhajir Makki in which he pleaded to his spiritual guide in
state of Wajd o Zauq o Sukr (unconsciousness, oblivion and zest),
while the Fatwa of Ismail Shaheed is applied on the one who beliefs so in state
of normal, not in unconsciousness and zest.”
(Saif-e-Rahmaani, page
65-66)
ANSWER TO SCAM 2:
Now it is revealed
that Shari’ah and Tareeqah (divine law and mysticism) are
two separate things in Deobandi creed. By making an excuse of Wajd o Zouq
o Sukr, writer of Saif-e-Rahmaanihas said that thing which none of
Deobandi scholars has said till date, nor he has quoted any of his scholars.
Instead, he has tried to hide in the shelter of Mufti Ahmed Yaar Khan Naeemi
Gujrati Sahib and Maulana Ahmed Saeed Shah Kazmi Sahib. As a need, the writer
of Saif-e-Rahmaanishould have presented proofs from the Divine Book and
Sunnah in approval of keeping beliefs of polytheism in sate
of Wajd and Sukr. But how come the ignorant, who quotes from
weeklyChattan, is aware of the Book
and Sunnah and Tafseer and Hadith and
Jurisprudence? If all Deobandi scholars confess that to call the Prophets,
nobles and saints for help in state of Wajd andSukr (possessed/unconscious,
zest, oblivion) is lawful then most of the issues will then be solved on its
own. The writer of Saif-e-Rahmaani realized this thing when the
verdict of Ismail the slaughterer (who was killed by Muslims) made Haji
Imdadullah a polytheist and cursed. When a Sunni Muslim pleads as:
غوث اعظم بمن بے سر
و ساماں مددے
قبلۂ دیں مددے کعبۂ ایمان مددے
قبلۂ دیں مددے کعبۂ ایمان مددے
بگر داب بلا افتادہ کشتی!
مدد کن یا معین الدین چشتی
Then he is called as
infidel without listening to any interpretation
of Wajd and Zauq andSukr but when Haji Imdadullah
Sahib is proved as polytheist and cursed according to Fatwa of Ismail the
slaughterer then Wajd and Zauq and Sukr comes on
the way. Has the Shari’ah Ruling given full relaxation in keeping
corrupt, polytheist and cursed beliefs while in state of Wajd and Zauq andSukr?
Contradicting Dialogue:
At one side the
ignorant writer is sacrificing his own scholar by referring those couplets as
special to Wajd o Zauq o Sukr, but other side he says “If there came any
difficult and complicated issue, Maulana Imdadullah Muhajir Makki used to solve
that academic trouble and difficulty by asking his guide Haji Noor Muhammad”.
(Saif-e-Rahmaani, page 65)
If the matter was only
in difficult and complicated issue and Haji Imdadullah Sahib used to solve only
academic troubles and difficulties then what was the need to present excuses of
state ofWajd o Zauq o Sukr? Even today people ask solutions for complicated and
academic matters to their scholars. Deobandis also do! What’s the need to
swindle in it? But it must be kept in mind that the matter is not only of
solution of complications and academics, but near to Haji Imdadullah Sahib it’s
lawful to plea saints of ALLAH everywhere in the world and in hereafter. Need
for solution of complications and academic matters can occur in this world but
Haji Imdadullah Sahib saying this about till the Day of Judgement. It is
written in the end of the same poem:
اے شہ نور محمد،وقت ہے امداد کا
آسرا دنیا میں ہے از بس تمہاری ذات کا
تم سوا اوروں سے ہرگز کچھ نہیں ہے التجا
بلکہ دن محشر کے بھی جس وقت قاضی ہو خدا
آپ کا دامن پکڑ کر یوں ک ہوں گا بر ملا
اے شہ نور محمد وقت ہے امداد کا
آسرا دنیا میں ہے از بس تمہاری ذات کا
تم سوا اوروں سے ہرگز کچھ نہیں ہے التجا
بلکہ دن محشر کے بھی جس وقت قاضی ہو خدا
آپ کا دامن پکڑ کر یوں ک ہوں گا بر ملا
اے شہ نور محمد وقت ہے امداد کا
Translation:
“O master Noor
Muhammad! This is the time for assistance; the only reliance in the world is
your personality.
Except for you, there
is no appeal to anyone; rather also on that Last Day when LORD will be the
Judge.
I will hold your
support and will continue saying; O king Noor Muhammad! This is time for help.”
It should be noticed
that Haji Sahib is saying this about his spiritual guide that “The only
reliance in the world is your personality” and “except for you, there is no
appeal to anyone in this world”, rather tomorrow on the Day of Judgement when
ALLAH will be the Judge even then “I will hold your support and will continue
saying; O king Noor Muhammad! This is time for help”.
Tell us! Which
complicated and difficult academic issues will be solved on the Day of
Judgement while Doomsday is Daar ul Jazaa (house of result)? Will
Haji Imdadullah Sahib ask solution of complicated academic issues to Maulana
Noor Muhammad Sahib on the Day of Judgement? Why you are exposing your
ignorance and stupidity by presenting such meaningless interpretations? If Haji
Imdadullah Muhajir Makki Sahib can plea to his spiritual guide, can call upon
him, consider him listener of worries and solver of difficulties
(Mushkil-Kusha) in state of Wajd o Zauq o Sukr, then does a Sunni Muslim
call upon and plea for help to Syedna Ghouth-e-A’zam king of Baghdad or Khwaja
Ghareeb Nawaz king of India with hatred and antagonism rather than in state
of Jazb o Zauq o Wajd (possessed, zest, unconscious)?
DEOBANDI SCAM NO. 3:
“In Takfeeri
Afsana on page 38 under the title “Deobandi Magazine degrades Imam-e-A’zam
Abu Hanifah” it is written “I have never found a high ranked scholar and
Muhadith from Syria till India equal to status of him (Anwar Kaashmiri)….. If I
swear that this (Anwar Kaashmiri) is the scholar higher in rank than
Imam-e-A’zam Abu Hanifah then I will not be a liar in my claim.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
18 December 1964)
Deobandi Interpretation 1:
Haziness and confusion
of Yousuf Rahmaani can be anticipated by the fact that the debased
interpretation he has put to refute this reference that is the bizarre example
of madness. He says “If these words mean reality then the president of
‘Pak-Sunni Tanzeem’ can also be blamed. Writes about Qazi Muhammad ‘Aaqil
Sahib:
الصلوۃ التحیہ
والسلام
اے محمد عاقل اے اعظم امام
بو حنیفہ وقت خود لاریب شک
گفت فخر تونسہ آں پیرے بحق
اے محمد عاقل اے اعظم امام
بو حنیفہ وقت خود لاریب شک
گفت فخر تونسہ آں پیرے بحق
(With reference to
Saif-e-Rahmaani, page 70)
ANSWER TO SCAM 3:
Now a sensible person
should let us know if this is an answer? We have quoted reference of
Khuddaam-ud-Deen, which is resposible representative of all Congressy Deobandi
Wahabi World, of Ahmed Ali Lahori, the only Shaykh ut Tafseer of Deobandis and
ex-Leader of Jam’iatul Ulema-e-Islam, which was about Shaykh ul Hadith of
Madarasa-e-Deoband (Anwar Kaashmiri) who is among the highly prominent scholar
of Deoband. It says:
“If I swear that this
(Anwar Kaashmiri) is the scholar higher in rank than Imam-e-A’zam Abu Hanifah
then I will not be a liar in my claim.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
18 December 1964)
Writer
of Saif-e-Rahmaani must see with open eyes that in the above
statement, it is written in Khuddaam-ud-Deen “If I swear…” This claim
was supported with swear while matter of Qazi Muhammad ‘Aaqil’s matter is not
supported with swear. Then it has been pledged that Anwar Kaashmri is greater
than Imam-e-A’zam in that statement. And in the statement praising Qazi ‘Aaqil,
he has been called “بو حنیفہ وقت, Abu Hanifah of his era” by Maulana Ghulam Jahaniyan Sahib,
there is no harm in saying Abu Hanifah or Imam-e-A’zam of his era/time. Issue
is to call someone greater in status than Imam-e-A’zam Abu Hanifah with pledge.
These two statements carry immense differences among each other.
But how can one use his
mind if he has Devil enclosed in it (Jis key Dimagh mein ‘Deo’ Band ho)? There
is no harm in calling someone as Ghazali of his time, Ghouth of his era, Raazi
of age or Qutb of today. Issue is in calling someone higher in rank than Imam
Ghazali, Imam Raazi and Ghouth-e-A’zam with pledge. Then the justification
presented by writer of Saif-e-Rahmaani is totally fake blame that on
the posters of Urs (anniversary of a late saint), A’la Hazrat is
written as Imam-e-A’zam. This is also his sightlessness because
in Urs of both Imam-e-A’zam and Syedi Muhadith-e-A’zam in Lailpoor is
arranged jointly whose combined poster is published, in which Hazrat Syedna Abu
Hanifah is labeled as Imam-e-A’zam and no one else. Even if someone writes such
words, it would be a separate matter but Khuddaam-ud-Deen has pledged
for the superiority of Anwar Kaashmiri to Imam-e-A’zam Abu Hanifah (RahmatULLAH
Alaih). How could both these matters be same? Be ashamed, atleast a tittle!
Yousuf Rahmaani Degrades Imam-e-A’zam:
Writer
of Saif-e-Rahmaani writes on page 71 “Instead, it is our belief that
if saying of Imam-e-A’zam is against Qur’aan and Hadith then we will
reject that too”. This is the babbled “Hanafiyah” of Deobandis as if near to
them the matters of Imam-e-A’zam can be contradictory of Qur’aan and Hadith and
even with the claim of being Hanafi you do not feel any shame or embarrassement
in snubbing it then why are you betraying Muslims by the label of Hanafi? Have
you ever announced to reject away the insulting and shameless statements of
Ashraf Ali Thanvi, Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi, Qasim Nanotawi and Khaleel Ambethwi ???
DEOBANDI SCAM NO. 4:
Writer
of Saif-e-Rahmaani says “It is written in Takfeeri Afsana, page 31,
with the title ‘Belief of Ahmed Ali Lahori’ that ‘Listen! I use to say if you
name yourself as Maadhu Singh, Ganga Raam; offer five times prayer, give annual
charity thoroughly, perform pilgrimage if it is obligated on you, fast thirty
days of Ramadan, then I give the judicial decree (Fatwa) that he is an
absolutely true Muslim’ (Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore, Shaykhut Tafseer Number)”.
Deobandi Interpretation 1:
“Ahmed Ali Lahori has
said that if a person recites and believes in Kalima
“لا الہ الا اللہ
محمد رسول اللہ”
(the declaration of
faith), performs Hajj, gives annual charity then he is Muslim no matter
whatever his name is.”
(Saif-e-Rahmaani, page 73)
ANSWER TO INTERPRETATION 1 OF SCAM 4:
We challenge that if
you show the words of Kalima in statement of Ahmed Ali Lahori then we
will give you One Thousand Rupees. Also, it is to be asked that Ahmed Ali
Lahori is not Shaarih(an explanatory) then on what basis he is permitting
to adopt names like Maadhu Singh and Ganga Raam? Had not the Prophet (Peace and
blessings of ALLAH be upon him) refuted to adopt names of polytheism? Didn’t
forbid indulging Non-Islamic names in Islamic names? Who is Ahmed Ali Lahori to
permit names like Ganga Raam, Maadhu Singh? Most probably this was the reason
that Deobandi Ameer-e-Shari’at Ataullah Bukhari adopted name “Pandit Kirpa Raam
Barham Chaari” in jail of Denaajpur.
(Kitab-e-Ataullah Bukhari,
page 20)
Anyhow! If names like
Maadhu Singh and Ganga Raam are not forbidden then from today we too will be
calling Mulla Yousuf Rahmaani as Moulvi Ganga Raam.
Deobandi Interpretation 2:
Moulvi Ganga Raam
copied the other statement which contradicted this statement on page 74
of Saif-e-Rahmaani “If one names himself as Abdullah Jaan, Muhammad
Deen, ALLAH Rakha, and Muhammad Jaan, but does not offer any prayer, does not
fast in Ramadan never, performs pilgrimage even if obligatory, never gives
annual charity then I give this judicial decree (Fatwa) that he is absolutely
true infidel.”
(Takfeeri Afsana, page 31;
Khuddaam-ud-Deen, 22 February 1963, page 42)
Moulvi Ganga Raam
interprets it this way “If even one denying the obligations and essentilities
(Faraaid-o-Wajibaat) is not an infidel then who is? What’s the meaning of
Hadith “من ترک الصلوۃ
متعمدا فقد کفر (الحدیث)” then? And why did
Hazrat Abu Bakr announced a battle against refuters of annual charity?
ANSWER TO INTERPRETATION 2:
It’s Answer has already
been given by Moulvi Ganga Raam that he says “If even one denying the
obligations and essentilities (Faraaid-o-Wajibaat) is not an infidel then who
is? What’s the meaning من ترک الصلوۃ متعمدا
فقد کفر (الحدیث) then?” As an answer, Moulvi Ganga Raam should know that
the meaning (of Hadith) is same which you’ve said that one who refutes
(becomesMunkir of) obligations, prayers, fasting, annual charity,
pilgrimage is infidel, but one leaving them due to laziness and carelessness
then he’s not an infidel. Over here, to refute means to deny its obligation and
denier of obligation is verily an infidel. Consequently, Moulvi Ganga Raam has
also agreed on this that Hazrat Syedna Abu Bakr Siddeeq (Radi ALLAHu Anh) waged
war against the refuters of obligation of Zakah (annual charity);
over here he himself is saying that the people who don’t
give Zakah are great sinners but not infidels. Otherwise, (if this
difference is not considered then) Moulvi Ganga Raam should stand up with his
Deobandi army and announce a war against those who don’t pay annual charity as
compliance to Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddeeq. Thus ignorant Moulvi Ganga Raam should
understand that one who denies the obligation of prayer, fasting, pilgrimage,
annual charity is an infidel but one who is lazy in its fulfillment will be
called as a great sinner but not an infidel, one not performing (Be-‘Amal, yet
beliefs them to be obligations on him) will not be called as infidel.
Fatwa of Mufti of Deoband:
Mufti Mahdi Hasan of,
Headquarter of Moulvi Ganga Raam, Madarasa Deoband, in his Fatwa (judicial
decree) in 14/06/1970 says while writing about Founder of Jamat-e-Islami Mr.
Moudoodi “His views are not correct, he doesn’t consider that Muslim a Muslim
who doesn’t fulfil acts (Be-‘Amal)”.
(Tehreek-e-Moudoodiat
Apnay Asli Rang Mein, page 32)
This Fatwa has
signatures of Mufti Ayzaaz Ali Amrohi, and stamp of “Darul Ifta” of Deoband.
But if even after this, Moulvi Ganga Raam considers those Muslims who don’t
fulfil religious acts (Be-‘Amal) as infidels then he should also implement this
on one who breaks his fast.
Moulvi Ganga Raam against Founder of Madarasa-e-Deoband Qasim
Nanotawi:
“(Incident no. 373):
Hazrat (Nanotawi) was eating cooked beans in the premises of Masjid and asked
(Moulvi Rafee’-ud-Deen) to join. Then I (Moulvi Rafee’-ud-Deen) replied
“Hazrat! I am fasting”. He again invited after sometime to join, I went and
started eating without any hesitation while ‘Asr prayers had been offered and
“Iftar” was near (yet was not time for Iftar/time of legally breaking the
fast). Mr. Qasim said ALLAH Almighty will reward you more than the standard
reward for this fast.”
(Arwaah-e-Thalaatha, page
379)
Now, Moulvi Ganga Raam
should put Fatwa of infidelity on Founder of Madarasa-e-Deoband Qasim Nanotawi
and Moulvi Rafee’-ud-Deen, do it quickly!
DEOBANDI SCAM NO. 5:
We wrote on page 33
of Takfeeri Afsana “He (Ahmed Ali Lahori) used to forgive everyone
but never forgave polytheist and the one spreading innovation.”
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, Lahore,
March 1963, page 13)
We presented Moulvi
Ahmed Ali’s this act contradicting to the statement: “Once on the invitation of
Maulana Dawood Ghaznavi (Ghair Muqallid Wahabi) there was a meeting at his
Madrasa Sheesh Mahal. Hazrat (Ahmed Ali) was already seated. Mr. Moudoodi and
Maulana Abul Hasanaat (Barelvi) came afterwards. Hazrat (Ahmed Ali) stood up
for every one of them and embraced them.
(Khuddaam-ud-Deen, 8th
March 1963, page 12)
We proved this
contradiction in belief and deed by the fact that people whom he considered to
be polytheists and of innovation, yet he respected them too, to whom he stood
and embraced also. To this matter, the following Deobandi interpretation is
presented.
Deobandi Interpretations:
Ignorant writer
of Saif-e-Rahmaani states:
1. “While following his
A’la Hazrat and raising the slogan of ‘Ya Shaykh Abdul Qaadir Jeelani Shai-an
Lillah’, Mulla Muhammad Hasan Rizawi has admitted that in reality Maulana Abul
Hasanaat Barelvi is polytheist and infidel.
2. The Holy Prophet
(Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) too embraced Non-Muslims and laid
his mantle for them.
3. Maulana Abul
Hasanaat was not a “Raza Khani” as you people….. If a person comes forward for
forgiveness then is he forgiven or not?”
(Saif-e-Rahmaani, page 78)
ANSWER TO SCAM 5:
It seems the so called
debater of Islam Ganga Raam has gone insane, where have we written Allama
Maulana Abul Hasanaat Syed Muhammad Ahmed Qaadiri (RahmatULLAH Alaih) as an
innovator and polytheist (May ALLAH forbid)? This is his mere blindness and
devilish perception.
We haven’t written even
a word, rather not even a letter of our own. Meaning is that they themselves
declare scholars of Ahle Sunnat as polytheists and innovators but as respect of
a scholar Allama Abul Hasanaat Qaadiri among the same scholars of Ahle Sunnat,
Deobandi Shaykh ut Tafseer Ahmed Ali Lahori stood for him and embraced him. If
he really was an innovator and polytheist then why he stood up for him? Why
embraced him? It’s clearly stated in Qur’aan about polytheist “O believers!
These polytheists are totally impure”. If (May ALLAH forbid) Maulana Abul
Hasanaat Qaadiri was a polytheist and innovator, and his beliefs (Present and
Witnessing, knowledge of unseen for Prophet SalALLAHu Alaihi Wasallam, etc.)
were of polytheism then following what rule of Shari’ah did (Ahmed Ali) embrace
him? And for Mr. Moudoodi, Moulvi Ataullah Bukhari and Ahmed Ali Lahori have
declared him to be one of the thirty “Dajjaals” and to include him in the list
of Muslims is the mortification of religion, then by what mean he stood in his
respect, embraced him? How did he hug to one of the thirty Dajjaals? Was
Shaykh ut Tafseer of Deobandi born to respect and embrace and
welcome Dajjaals? What’s the meaning of this respect to whom he considers
to be polytheist and Dajjaal?
Left over is why
Prophet (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) laid his mantles (for the
polytheists), the reason is that the Prophet is mercy for worlds, is
communicator of unseen; he knew to whom his words and courteous deeds were
going to affect among the disblelievers and polytheists and who were going to
accept faith and till what time they would accept faith. If the ignorant
Deobandi writer and debater Ganga Raam insists upon the matter that it is
correct to have respect for the polytheists then you yourself tell us as to why
Ahmed Ali Lahori wrote this that he never forgave polytheists and those who
spread innovation. So, tell us whether this deed was against
the Sunnah of Prophet or not, because according to saying Mulla
Rahmaani the Holy Prophet (Peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) used to
lay his mantle for polytheists and used to respect them. But Ahmed Ali Lahori
Sahib never forgave polytheists and innovators. Is his deed not contradictory
to Sunnah of Prophet?
Left over is the
foolish stretch that Maulana Abul Hasanaat (Alaihir Rahmah) was not Barelvi
like us. Verily Allama Abul Hasanaat (Alaihir Rahmah) was a true Sunni Rizawi
Barelvi having true beliefs, and was claimant and standard bearer of
Maslak-e-A’la Hazrat Fazil-e-Barelvi (Alaihir Rahmah). For clearing doubts, see Khutba-e-Sadaarat Hazrat
Maulana Abul Hasanaat Qaadiri Sadar Markazi Jami’at-e-Ulema-e-Pakistan (Page
4).
He has said:
“At one place to bring
change and accept the newly meaning of Last Prophecy concept into practice,
bomb of “Tahzeerun Naas” was thrown. At other, by covering as “Auhaam-e-Batila”
knowledge and concept of Prophecy was attacked severely. Somewhere by keeping
the name “Baraheen-e-Qaati’ah”, thunder of falsehood was thrown on Muslims. By
producing thousands of such worldly revolts, snatching away of faith was
attempted. In this delicate situation, prominent scholars of Ahle Sunnat like
A’la Hazrat Imam-e-Ahle Sunnat Mujaddid of this century (Imam Ahmed Raza), Sadr
ur Afadil Moulna Muhammad Naeem-ud-Deen Muradabadi and Hazrat Abil Mukarram
Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shah Abu Syed Muhammad Deedar Ali Sahib guided Muslims
and saved their precious faith from the devilish acts of Deobandi’ism.”
Tell us Moulvi Ganga
Raam! Is Allama Abul Hasanaat a Sunni Rizawi Barelvi like us, rather even far
more than us, or not?
It will be a falsehood
if this blame is accepted that Maulana Abul Hasanaat went to apologize, (had
Ahmed Ali Lahori and Maulana Dawood Ghaznavi got the rights and authorities of
forgiveness and not ALLAH?); if so then it also means Moulvi Ahmed Ali himself
walked to apologize and to resign from his so called Hanafiyah from
Ghair Muqallid Moulvi Dawood Ghaznawi at his Madarasa? Before writing this
devilish statement, Mulla Ganga Raam did not even think thatKhuddaam-ud-Deen has
written ‘there was a meeting invited by Maulana Dawood Ghaznawi (Ghair
Muqallid) in his Madarasa Sheesh Mehel’. Is ‘meeting’ known as ‘gathering for
apology’? Allama Abul Hasanaat was chosen and accepted as a president and Imam
and representative and it was agreed in 1952 to choose him as President of
“Tehreek-e-Khatm-e-Nubuwat” by Moulvi Ataullah Bukhari, Moulvi Ahmed Ali
Lahori, Abdullah Darkhwasti and Moulvi Dawood Ghaznavi etc. If they had to make
him apologize they could do it at the time when vowed him as President. But we
say that all these are the devilish thoughts and perceptions of Moulvi Ganga
Ram. Deception, fraud and scam are his destiny, and same is the vicinity of
their moralization. ALLAH’s curse be upon the liars!
EMINENT SCHOLARS OF DEOBAND IN GUNPOINT
OF SAIF-E-RAHMAANI
HAJI IMDADULLAH SAHIB VS YOUSUF RAHMAANI:
BELIEF OF HAJI IMDADULLAH:
He says “People say
that Prophets and saints don’t have knowledge of unseen, I say to whom bona
fide people look at they have perception and visualization of unseens. Actually
this knowledge is true; (the deniers say) the Holy Prophet (SalALLAHu Alaihi
Wasallam) did not have knowledge about Hudaybia and (matters of) Hazrat Ayesha,
they think it to be a rationale for their claim which is wrong.”
(Shumaim-e-Imdadiya, vol
2, page 61)
FATWA OF YOUSUF RAHMAANI:
He states with
reference to the judicial decree (Fatwa) of Maulana Thanaullah Panipati Hanafi
“Saints don’t have knowledge of unseen. Yes! This can be said that saints get
news or Kashfabout the veiled things due to their spiritual sight, and
saying that saints have knowledge of unseen is infidelity.”
(Saif-e-Rahmaani, page 64)
RASHEED AHMED GANGOHI VS YOUSUF RAHMAANI:
BELIEF OF RASHEED AHMED GANGOHI:
“Disciple should make
sure that spirit of spiritual guide is not fixed at a point. Instead, where the
disciple would be, either near or far, even if the body of spiritual guide is
apparently far from the disciple but he is not away from guide’s mysticism…..
Then the disciple will be needy of his spiritual guide all the time in solving
problems, and when he conceives of guide and asks about with tongue, his spirit
will answer him (disciple) with ALLAH’s permission.”
(Imdad-us-Sulook, page 24)
FATWA OF YOUSUF RAHMAANI:
Yousuf Rahmaani, by
copying some references, blindly writes “One who thinks and says that the
spirits of saints are present and knowing is an infidel.”
(Saif-e-Rahmaani, page 63, attested by Moulvi Ghulam
Khan and Moulvi Muhammad Shareef of Khair ul Madaaris, Multan)
At Last
Spend some moment for Duaa
O' Allah give us the
love and worry that Prophet peace be upon him had
for ummah.
O' Allah make us Muslims true and honest like Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique.
O' Allah make our judiciary to give judgement like Hazrat Umar Farooque
Azam.
O' Allah make our heart kind and generous like Hazrat Usman Ghani.
O' Allah give us Islamic strength and faith like Hazrat Ali.
O' Allah give us strength to work for the cause of Islam. Ameeen
for ummah.
O' Allah make us Muslims true and honest like Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique.
O' Allah make our judiciary to give judgement like Hazrat Umar Farooque
Azam.
O' Allah make our heart kind and generous like Hazrat Usman Ghani.
O' Allah give us Islamic strength and faith like Hazrat Ali.
O' Allah give us strength to work for the cause of Islam. Ameeen
Note: if you find any
typing mistak please inform me…………in Sha Allah will be corrected.
Yours,
Aale Rasool Ahmad Al-
Ashrafi Al-Qadri
Blogger: http://aalerasoolahmad.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment